Ovation serial number dating elite dating site south africa
The issue, Laber insists, is that people are dating folks whom they like. From his piece: Assortative mating is when someone partners and starts a family with someone of a similar background.
It can be based on innate characteristics, such as race and ethnicity, or socioeconomic backgrounds.
Considering that one reason for assortative mating is because people of similar backgrounds and interests spend the most time together, one would think that Laber might suggest that his readers learn how to spend more time in those liberal spaces. Nor does Laber ask for his audience to understand NFL stars are taking a knee before the national anthem.
There’s no explanation that conservatives may want to read a book that doesn’t involve Ayn Rand, to learn to cook a delicious meal, or play guitar.
There’s not even a pseudo-financial explanation that charity and altruism increase one’s value in the “sexual marketplace” and perhaps volunteering at the local pet shelter might spur women to overlook their chortling over “Grab ’em by the pussy” jokes. The men showed up in the first place, and so they’ve done their part; now women have to come across.
One of the underlying themes of Laber’s complaints about assortative mating is that this came about because of the increase in rights and opportunities for women.
Nobody is remotely interested in having sex with someone who thinks that they’re beyond contempt.
It’s easy for Laber to snort with derision about how this is “causing people to see an opposing viewpoint as an all-out assault on their personhood”, but is a good start, it’s a little understandable why someone might not want to scramble their DNA with someone who thinks that every sperm is sacred and is willing to back that belief up with legislation. Assortative mating serves to intensify this polarization.
Last Tuesday, The Federalist – a conservative news organization that seems to devote at least a third of its coverage to lamenting that women won’t sleep with them – decided to publish the hottest of hot takes: that women who refuse to give it up to conservatives are why Trump won. Women are, in fact, refusing to date or sleep with Trump voters.
As it turns out, #MAGA is the ultimate anaphrodisiac; red hats are becoming the new “tiger pic” of Tinder.
And with the number of people who are either queer themselves or have LGBTQ friends and family, it’s not unreasonable to prefer to date people who will reaffirm the basic humanity of their loved ones. It amplifies an already significant ingroup-outgroup mentality around contentious social issues.
But while we’re at it: One of the things that’s significant about Laber’s screed is who he’s directing it towards: women. Social and cultural issues create severe disagreement because they trigger the emotional part of the brain: the disagreement challenges a core part of group identity.
This is exactly the type of schism that an arrogant demagogue like Trump exploits.